Symbolic space French enlightenment architecture and its legacy by Richard a etlin
book review, subject could also be French Architecture
Richard Etlin, in his study, Symbolic Space: French Enlightenment Architecture and Its Legacy, offers his insight into the integral relationship architecture has within the activities of man. Politics, science, social organization, and religion, all have spaces unique to their own functional character. Beyond a functional character, however, there exists a deeper, more spiritual connection man has with his surroundings. The emotional role of architecture is one focus of Etlin's work. In his treatment of emotion and its relevance in architecture, Etlin relates modern designs with those of the visionary French architects during the late eighteenth century.
In understanding the role of emotion, Etlin first establishes his notion of space. Mankind has the unique ability to control, design, and shape his environment to his needs. «Architecture is concerned primarily with the creation of domains for human activity,» Etlin writes. Apart from activity alone, architecture creates «spatial realms...with qualities that affect the viewer and the user.» Architecture can establish a meaning and a feeling; it will affect man's mood. The mood is created and controlled by an architect's use and design of space. Etlin elaborates more on this idea of space, «All of these intellectual and subjective considerations about space, which reach beyond the mere measurement of height, width, and depth, and beyond the mere description of geometric features, are aspects of symbolic space.» Symbolic space elevates architecture into something more cerebral and more personal than just the basic elements. It imparts the same notion and feeling of viewing a work of art, but allowing man more
freedom; the freedom to use a work of art for his own benefit. The functional aspect of space is very important: «We find that symbolic space is invariably commingled with the various codes of order by which humans organize their world.» Symbolic space is broken down into three types, which form Etlin's «unifying thread» of his book: primal space, organized space based on social codes, and the multi-layered space of meaning within a particular place. Using this framework as a guide, Etlin concentrates on demonstrating the symbolic similarities of modern architects such as Cret, Wright, and Le Corbusier, with the theoretical works of visionaries such as Boullee and Ledoux.
Etlin begins his work with the phrase, «The Eighteenth century saw radical changes in the world of architecture.» Stemming from the ideas of the Enlightenment, architecture began to take on a new type of dynamic. It was beginning to move more towards an active role in everyday life, centered upon the ideal of embellissement, or embellishment. Architecture and the changes occurring in this field during the eighteenth century «must be understood to include cultural aspirations and functional amenities as well as aesthetic pleasures.» Space was starting to take on meaning; it was to create an impression.
Boullee is a prime example of space encompassing some type of meaning. His buildings were to have an expressive and metaphorical character, but perhaps more importantly, he wanted them to have a symbolic character. «Boullee provided each of his civic buildings with a temple-like space consecrated to the idea of the institution housed there,» Etlin writes. This idea could be expressed through his use of domes, or peristyles, to indicate some type of importance to a building. The observer is able to glance at a building, and immediately identify with the importance of the event taking place there. Boullee's neoclassical legacy can be identified with more modern buildings in Washington, D. C. Etlin uses the example of the National Archives Building (1933-1935) to demonstrate a link to the architects of the past. The Archives Building houses such important documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights under a «hemispherically domed rotunda». Etlin tries to invoke the neoclassical images of these buildings, but takes this image one step further. One must also consider the documents housed in this building:
It would be difficult to find a more appropriate match between the ideas expounded in these documents, the idea of symbolic space not only to house them but also to make them manifest, and the mentality that could conceive both, a mentality convinced by the correctness and naturalness of such abstract ideas as the rights of man and the legitimacy of democracy in the human community and relation to the cosmic order.
Etlin, in his description, is not writing so much on the part of the actual structure of the building. The description is effective in that it concentrates on the emotion of the building and the metaphorical relationship man has with the contents of the building. The example of the National Archives and its meaning as a building is the first major example of a modern structure with its legacy rooted to the symbolic space of the past.
The eighteenth century was a time of political change. The old institutions were being overthrown, giving rise to a sense of the importance of the individual. Etlin considers the architecture of the late eighteenth century, most particularly associated with the French Revolution, as «Revolutionary Space». Revolutionary space does not stray from the earlier types of character expressed by Boullee. «The values of the Revolution... (are) equivalent to the three types of character - metaphorical, expressive, and symbolic,» Etlin writes. The corresponding types of revolutionary space follow these three aspects in the same fashion as Boullee: narrative, expressive, and numinous. Numinous is perhaps the most distinct, having a meaning meant to establish a «deeply rooted emotive response.» The Revolution demanded a new face to Paris. As the adage goes, «out with the old, in with the new.» Any reminder of the brutal past was desired to be erased and changed, with a revolutionary twist. The goal of architecture was to create a sense of independence, «So that merely by walking across town he or she would imbibe a republican message.» Symbolism was to be seen everywhere. Monuments to victories of the people, or the transformation of the Bastille, or the conversion of toll gates to victory arches; such was the goal of revolutionary architecture. «During the revolution, hardly an urban design project could escape the appeal of a symbolic civics
lesson,» Etlin reiterates. Again, Etlin uses Boullee's work to demonstrate the symbolic idea of the revolution. «Boullee abstracted the idea of biblical tablets in the design of the neoclassical facade for his proposed Palais National.» The Palais National was a huge temple to the revolution and the people of France, and furthermore, it was to have a functional purpose within the government. The goal of Boullee is to offer the people the feeling that their revolution against the king was just and almost as important as the biblical struggles. By connecting the revolution with the bible, it is almost impossible to feel a type of emotion stirred up inside; Boullee is trying to get the viewer to have a chill in his spine.
Modern man has followed the revolutionary space idea in several contexts. Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Hussein's Iraq are some of Etlin's examples. One legacy from revolutionary space is the concept of size and enormity. Iraq's «Victory Arch» is two-and-a-half times larger than the Arc de Triomphe. An example even closer to Boullee's Palais National is the cosmic metaphor indicated in Tatlin's monument to the Third International (1920). Tatlin's use of «two intertwining helixes symbolizing the dynamism of the Russian Revolution». This building again is working to invoke emotion, a spiritual message through the action of a revolution.
Pages: 1 2
Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
Acceptance Essays – Roman Roman
Romanesque - Gothic 50 Minutes/ Rating 9 The difference between Gothic and Romanesque architecture is the spiritual approach. In Romanesque the emphasis was on transcendental and feudalistic systems whereas in the Gothic this approach was humanized and individualized. The Gothic architecture emphasized upward movement towards god, a feeling that cannot be found in a Romanesque The events leading up to the international style of architecture being used in America One common criticism of modern architects such as Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius is that while their goals might have been laudable, the execution and physical manifestation of their beliefs is somehow disconnected from the culture in which it grew out of. As 'ineffective' as critics might say this style was, there is What impact has technology had on architecture of the 20th century? Throughout the nineteenth century, architecture refused to have anything to do with industry; it had been concerned solely with monumental projects glorifying the state and giant civic structures expressing the pride of its people. This however, all changed with the dawn of the twentieth century. Industrial production became an integral part of modern society and Architecture – Herzog Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron are among the very few architects whose work can be interpreted as an effort to regain architecture’s original grounds. They believe that although a certain concept and preliminary design must always be used, architecture “builds itself”, and by having an open mind during the creation of a building, you Greek Architecture Essay The architecture of ancient Greece is represented by buildings in the sanctuaries and cities of mainland Greece, the Aegean islands, southern Italy and Sicily, and the Ionian coast of Turkey. Monumental Greek architecture began in the archaic period, flourished through the classical and Hellenistic periods, and saw the first of many revivals during the Roman