California Vs Peterson
Sample - 757 words essay topic, essay writing: California Vs Peterson
Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old wife who was eight months pregnant, disappeared on December 24, 2002. When the body of the California woman and her unborn child were found four months later, her husband, Scott, was charged with two counts of murder. Detective Craig Grogan gave a sworn statement that he had probable cause to believe Mr. Peterson committed two counts of the crime of 187 Penal Code, homicide, on or about December 23, 2002 or December 24,2002, in the county of Stanislaus. April 17, 2003 at 0658 hours the Judge of the Superior Court in Stanislaus County, California issued a warrant for the arrest of Scott Lee Peterson. The court found that the District Attorney's office did, in fact, have probable cause to bring Scott Peterson in.
The Judge specifically addressed bail in the warrant. No bail was granted. April 18, 2003 at 1110 hours, Scott Peterson was arrested at the Torrey Pines Golf Course, in Sand Diego County, California. At the time of his arrest, Peterson had colored his hair blonde, grown a beard and mustache, and was carrying $15,000.00 in
cash. During his arrest police also discovered that Peterson's car was full of camping and survival equipment. Peterson was arrested less than 20 minutes from the Mexican border
Peterson waived booking in San Mateo County, California, and was transferred back to Stanislaus County, California, where he was formally booked by the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department. Scott Peterson had his preliminary hearing on April 17, 2003. Superior Court Judge Al Girolami ordered Scott Peterson to stand trial on two counts of murder. Peterson's arraignment quickly followed. Peterson was arraigned on April 21, 2003.
The Prosecution charged him with the following: Count I: On or about and between December 23, 2002 and December 24, 2002, the defendant did commit a felony, Murder, violation of Section 187 of the California Penal Code; the defendant did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously and with malice aforethought murder Laci Denise Peterson, a human being. Special Allegation charges were made in conjunction with the felony murder charge of Laci Denise Peterson. It is further alleged as to Count 1, MURDER that the defendant acted intentionally, deliberately and with premeditation. Enhancement: TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY. During the commission of the murder of Laci Denise Peterson, the defendant, with the knowledge that Laci Denise Peterson was pregnant, did inflict injury on Laci Denise Peterson resulting in the termination of her pregnancy, a violation of Section 12022.9 (a) of the California Penal Code. Count II: On or about and between December 23, 2002 and December 24, 2002, defendant did commit a felony, MURDER, violation of Section 187 of the California Penal Code; in that the defendant did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously and with malice aforethought murder Baby Conner Peterson, a fetus.
It is further alleged as to Count II, MURDER, that the defendant acted intentionally, deliberately, and with premeditation. It is further alleged as to Counts I & II, MURDER, the defendant committed more than one murder in the 1st or 2nd degree in this proceeding, and is a special circumstance within the meaning of Penal Code section 190.2 (a) (3)The defense filed for a change of venue. Due to the high publicity of the case, and the hostile public opinion, the judge granted a change of venue. The trial was moved to Redwood City, California. The trial began on June 1, 2004.
After eight months of testimony, the jury was handed the case for deliberation on November 3, 2004. November 9, 2004, the Judge removed a juror from the jury panel. Alternate number one assumed his place on the jury. Deliberations continued until November 11, 2004. On November 11, 2004, the Judge removed the jury foreman from the jury panel.
Alternate number two assumed her place on the panel. On November 12, 2004, the jury returned with a verdict of guilty to both counts I and II. They also found that the special circumstances had been met in both counts. After two weeks of penalty phase testimony, the jury began deliberating the sentence to be imposed on Scott Peterson. On December 13, 2004, the jury delivers the recommendation of death to the Judge.
On March 16, 2005, the Judge upheld the jury recommendation for the death penalty. The court found that the defendant, Scott Lee Peterson, did willfully and intentionally murder his wife and unborn son. The Judge further ordered that the defendant be released to the California Department of Corrections, where he will await his execution. Scott Peterson has already begun his appeal process. Several motions have been filed by his attorney in reference to the dismissal of multiple jurors during deliberations. It will now be up to the California Court of Appeals to review the case and determine if there was any misconduct on the part of the Judge during juror dismissal.
paper and essay writing, free essay topics, sample works California Vs Peterson
Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
Judicial Process Of Jack Kevorkian Sample essay topic, essay writing: Judicial Process Of Jack Kevorkian - 1468 words
.. urder and delivery of a controlled substance (www. courttv. com).SENTENCING Before delivering the sentence, Oakland County Circuit Judge Jessica Cooper announced that this is a court of law, there are ways of challenging laws; however, you may not take the law into 12 angry men essay 12 angry men Gentlemen of the jury, I would like to point out to you three pieces of evidence that prove this young boy is innocent. I would like to revue the purchase of the knife, the old man hearing a yell, and the movie theater. The future of this young boy is in your Spellbound In the film Spellbound Dr. Murchison, the head of Green Manors mental asylum, is retiring to be replaced by Dr. Edwards, a famous psychiatrist. Dr. Edwards arrives and is immediately attracted to Dr. Constance Peterson. Nevertheless, it soon becomes apparent that Dr. Edwards is a paranoid amnesic fraud. He runs from the police and Dr. White Fang – Jack London «White Fang» starts out with 2 men and a group of 6 sled dogs traveling across the Arctic with a dead man in a coffin. This group was followed by a pack of famished wolves. Each night a female half wolf half dog would seduce a dog away and allow the pack to kill him. Gideon Vs. Wainwright Sample essay topic, essay writing: Gideon Vs. Wainwright - 665 words
United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments. GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT In June 1961, Clarence Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and